We use cookies to personalize content, improve site performance, and analyze traffic. We also share information about your site usage with our advertising and analytics partners. They may combine it with other data you have provided or that they have collected from your use of their services.
Customize
INB Team
May 21, 2026
“It’s already too late to enter affiliate marketing” – this is a common opinion among those who are just exploring the niche. And there are objective reasons for that: competition has increased, traffic has become more expensive, and results no longer come as quickly as they used to. Against this backdrop, it is easy to conclude that the market is simply oversaturated and that entering it has become significantly more difficult.
However, the reality is somewhat different. Affiliate marketing has indeed become more competitive, but the issue is not that “all the spots are taken” – it’s that the rules of the game have changed. What used to work with minimal effort now requires a systematic approach: testing, analysis, and market understanding.
To better understand what is really happening in the affiliate marketing market, we spoke with INB.bio senior affiliate manager Saba Skhulukhia.
When people enter affiliate marketing, they usually look first at Tier 1 GEOs: the USA, the UK, Canada, and Australia. The logic is simple: higher payouts, more expensive products, and generally wealthier populations. However, there are several important nuances.
These are mature markets. Large teams and experienced media buyers with well-optimized funnels have been operating here for a long time. As a result, competition is extremely high, and traffic is expensive – the cost per lead in nutra can reach $5–15 or more.
Consumers are already used to advertising, understand marketing tactics, and are more skeptical. They take longer to make decisions. This requires stronger creatives, more sophisticated funnels, and larger testing budgets. As a result, beginners often run one or two tests, lose their budget, and conclude that the market is “overheated.”
But if you move away from the most obvious GEOs, the picture looks completely different.
These markets are less popular and less saturated than Tier-1. There are fewer players, fewer polished funnels, and a lower entry barrier. Traffic is cheaper, allowing for more testing without the fear that one failed launch will consume the entire budget. Users are more responsive to advertising, more likely to leave leads, and move through funnels more easily.
Yes, there are nuances: lower average order value, lower purchasing power, and the importance of proper localization. However, due to higher lead volumes and cheaper testing, you can better understand what works and achieve profitability even with a smaller budget.
“If you only look at the most popular GEOs, it seems like everything is already taken. But if you look at the market more broadly, there are plenty of opportunities,” Saba assures.
To better understand the difference, here is a brief comparison of Tier 1 and Tier 2–3 GEOs:
| Parameter | Tier 1 GEO | Tier 2–3 GEO |
| Examples | USA, UK, Canada | Venezuela, Algeria, Kenya, Nigeria |
| Competition | Very high | Lower |
| Cost per lead | $5–15+ | Significantly lower |
| Audience behavior | Cautious, “overheated,” skeptical | Simpler, responds faster |
| Entry barrier | High | Lower |
| Testing | Expensive and risky | More affordable and flexible |
| Average order value | High | Lower |
| Lead volume | Lower for the same budget | Higher for the same budget |
🌿 Learn more about emerging markets and Tier-1 in our article.
The feeling that it is already too late to enter affiliate marketing often arises before the first launch. The reason is simple – expectations do not match reality.
Myth 1: “Everything is already taken.” What’s saturated are not the niches, but the most obvious directions – the same GEOs and approaches everyone is using. If you look broader, there are far more options.
Myth 2: “You can’t succeed without a large budget.” Budget alone does not determine success. Without testing and analysis, any amount of money can be wasted. With a proper understanding of the process, even small budgets can deliver results.
Myth 3: “It was easier before.” There was less competition before, but also less structure. Now it is harder at the start, but clearer how to achieve stable profitability.
Saba frequently encounters this in practice:
“Most people think that either everything is already taken, or that affiliate marketing is ‘easy money.’ That is absolutely not true.”
🌿 Read more about the history of affiliate marketing in our article.
Undoubtedly, 2–3 years ago it was much easier to enter affiliate marketing: it was enough to find a working funnel and scale it without changes. Today, that is no longer sufficient, and there are several reasons for this.
Today, building an affiliate business without a system and a clear understanding of the process is almost impossible:
“Before, you could just pour traffic and scale more easily. Now, without testing and adapting to a specific GEO, it simply doesn’t work. You need to build a system, not just copy funnels,” Saba explains.
Why do some people earn tens of thousands and scale, while others only burn through their budget? What is the difference in their approaches?
It’s simple: in the past, you could “get by” on luck, but that era is over. Those who earn consistently are the ones who build systems. They don’t copy funnels one-to-one – at most, they take an idea and adapt it to themselves: a different GEO, a different angle, a different presentation.
They are constantly testing. Not just one funnel, but several hypotheses in parallel – analyzing what generates a better response and cutting off what doesn’t perform.
And most importantly – they think long-term. They don’t expect one launch to “solve everything,” but instead build a repeatable process.
“Those who consistently make money don’t copy other people’s creatives. They may take an idea, but then adapt it to themselves. And they always rely on data – they test, analyze results, and scale what actually works,” says Saba.
Another factor that is often underestimated is time. Many people enter with the expectation of quick results, but that is a mistake.
If you have zero experience and a small budget, the worst thing you can do is immediately go into expensive GEOs, choose a complex offer, and try multiple traffic sources at once. You simply won’t understand what exactly didn’t work.
To avoid common beginner mistakes, it’s important to structure your process correctly from the start. Here is a simple framework to follow:
The USA, the UK, Canada, or Australia may look attractive due to higher payouts, but for beginners, this is the riskiest option. Traffic is expensive, competition is intense, and mistakes are costly.
At the beginning, it’s better to choose Tier 2–3 GEOs: traffic is cheaper and there is more room for testing. For example, Venezuela, Nigeria, Kenya, or Algeria. It’s easier to understand how things work here without burning your budget in just a few launches.
There’s no need to start with multiple directions. It’s better to begin with something simple and easy to understand, for example, a joint health offer. The target audience already understands their problem, so you don’t need to explain why the product is needed. Your task is to evaluate how the audience reacts to creatives and build the funnel correctly.
A typical beginner mistake is trying everything at once: Facebook, TikTok, native, push, Google. As a result, there is no focus and no understanding of where the problem lies.
It’s better to choose one traffic source and fully understand it. This way, you will identify patterns faster and avoid confusion between different advertising formats.
One launch tells you almost nothing. If you’ve tested only one creative and one approach, it’s too early to draw conclusions. A proper start involves several simple tests, for example: 2–3 creatives, 2 different angles, 1 GEO, 1 offer.
At the beginning, the key question is not “How much did I earn?” but “What did I learn from this launch?”
You need to analyze which creatives capture attention better, where users click more actively, where interest drops, whether they reach the lead form, and whether there is genuine engagement.
The first tests are meant to help you understand audience behavior.
If the results are weak, don’t change the GEO, offer, traffic source, and creatives all in one day. Otherwise, you won’t understand what exactly failed.
Change only one element at a time: either the angle, the creative, or the presentation. This will help you find a working combination faster.
You should only scale what has already proven effective: better CTR, more leads, stronger audience response. Decisions should be based strictly on analytics.
“I would start with a Tier 3 GEO, for example Venezuela, with a joint health offer. And simply begin testing: several creatives, several approaches, and observe where there is a response. Without expecting immediate profit – the goal at the start is to understand how it works. The most successful creatives are then scaled,” Saba advises.
Affiliate marketing has not become “oversaturated.” It has simply changed.
What once relied on luck now requires more attention, testing, and understanding of the process. Opportunities haven’t disappeared – they have just become less obvious.
If you want to work with GEOs where there is still room for growth – join INB.bio. Here, you will get access to offers, current markets, and the support of a professional team that knows exactly what works right now.
